Several Thoughts On The Assault Of Faith Goldy In Canada

In viewing the assault of journalist and center-right activist Faith Goldy, several words of advice come to mind, which can really be applied to any individual who wishes to peaceable assemble or advocate for some policy position:

  1. Never, ever back away from a Stalinist mob. You have a right to stand exactly where you are in a public setting. If you are arrive at a rally that you know Stalinists will be at, select your spot carefully. If you are there to document as a journalist, set up at a distance. Set up close to the police. Do not appear as the aggressor. If they are going to advance menacingly with the threat of assaulting you, force them to make good on their threat by firmly standing your ground. Understand the legal process you need to follow afterwards to prosecute an assault and position yourself beforehand to have the strongest case possible by not provoking and not responding in violence.
  2. Optics are everything. Who appears rational? Who appears reasonable? Who appears deranged and violent? The optics are already bad for the Stalinist thugs in this video, but they could have been much, much better.
  3. Know your level of engagement before going in. In many cases, your engagement with Stalinists should be extremely, extremely limited. In some cases, you should absolutely not engage at all. If you are keeping your distance in a public area, in a group, and not engaging, that forces them to attack you, which is a terrible look for them.
  4. Understand your opposition. Stalinists are naturally aggressive and many are borderline criminal, if not outright criminal. They want to attack. They want to commit crimes against you. Their allies in the media want as much as possible to portray it as an equal conflict, a “clash”, with both sides equally violent. Never, ever give them that opportunity. If a gang of Stalinists is going to attack you, make sure it is on your terms: that you are stationed apart from them, in a group, peaceful, and not engaging them at all.
  5. Understand triangulation. Too many times, individuals, whether it is culturally or economically, are under the mistaken impression that they should engage communists or Stalinists. This is FALSE and nothing could be further from the truth. Your audience is NOT them. You will rarely, if ever, change their mind. Your audience is the public at home, the undecideds, the centrists, the independents, who are open and amenable to your message. Always, always, always craft your message with that audience in mind. Speak to them.
  6. With those principles in mind, the general perception of public civic engagement as undertaken by center-right activists needs a wholescale reevaluation. Speak to independents and speak of Stalinists in the third person. Never engage them directly. Select your public ground carefully and stand your ground. Never, ever retreat. Know your rights in public. Do not be inflammatory and tailor your rhetoric appropriately. Be as inclusive as possible when assembling your arguments while not compromising your position.
  7. With all of that being said, this is how Faith should have executed her mission: 
    1. Set up shop close to the police.
    2. Filmed and monitored the rally from a distance.
    3. When the Stalinists became aware of her entourage and approached her, she should have not engaged them. Simultaneously, she should have had at least two individuals with her, all filming each other for their own legal protection.
    4. Holding her ground, she should have stayed peacefully in her area and documented the interaction. The Stalinists would have no doubt begun with a verbal engagement, with the desire to escalate to something physical.
    5. If the Stalinists, being entirely unprovoked and approaching her territory of their own volition, then wished to assault her on top of that, she would have been on extremely strong legal ground. The police would be forced into a quandary, given her proximity and the fact that she did not provoke the attack. This would be a win, both optically and legally. If the police do not arrest the criminals, she has a strong case against the state. If they do, it is a public deterrent to future Stalinists that makes them aware of the law.
    6. In the absolute worst case, if they assault her, she stands her ground, and the police do absolutely nothing, she wins a great public relations victory. Regardless of her politics or beliefs, the entire world sees a woman who did nothing, who was savagely attacked by masked men. If, in the absolute worst case, the police did nothing, she sued and still lost, she would still have won the optics battle. That is literally the best outcome she could achieve given the stacked circumstances.
    7. Instead, it appears she approached them and engaged them. Even if she didn’t engage them, she failed to select her monitoring spot carefully, as she was a great distance away from law enforcement. Compounding the error, she did not stand her ground, giving the appearance of guilt. Why would anyone back away from a public area out of fear? To do so looks guilty.
    8. So not only did she not select a correct spot, stand her ground, and not engage, she was assaulted, and will most likely not sue. The optics look muddy, she looks guilty for backing away, and it looks like a skirmish between two sides to some extent. The police can claim plausible deniability because they were not close enough and thus she can not hold them accountable for their failure to enforce the law.
    9. People have to understand that the deck is stacked against them, but the entire game is not rigged. Yes, communists have allies in the press, but even they have limitations. Understand the rules of the game and position your moves accordingly. The public sphere is incredibly important and simply appearing in public is a powerful message in and of itself, which is why Stalinists are intent on literally eradicating you from it. The freedom to peaceably assemble is a very important one.
Advertisements

The Fascist Left Only Cares About Power

When Laura Ingraham writes a fairly innocuous, inane comment on Twitter, the fascists in journalism will spring into action and pump out series after series of articles about it, elevating it, giving it a platform, and placing pressure on the corporations.

When Michael Rapaport unleashes a vile, misogynistic, cyber-bullying rant against a woman in media, those same fascist journalists will blatantly suppress that story.

One event helps them gain power; the other does not.

The fascist Left does not care about misogyny, they do not care about decency, they do not care about victims, or women, or discourse, or civility.

They only care about power – how to gain it, how to to destroy their opponents who have it, and how to protect their allies who have it.

Everything else is window dressing to be utilized for that purpose. Understand the rules of the rigged game. Do not complain that the game is rigged. Of course it is. Learn the rules and become good at them.

The next time you see major news corporations writing about somebody “under fire” for sexism, racism, misogyny, or any other supposed moral crime, understand that the target is an enemy of the fascist Left and they seek to diminish their targets’ power.

They do not care about morality or fairness, or notions like honor or decency. Any tool available at their disposal will be used, regardless of how unseemly, immoral, or dishonorable. Lying and deception are viewed as tools to them. Keep that in mind the next time you see a coordinated attack by the Fascist Left.

Fascist Mob Launches Harassment Campaign Against Activist Laura Ingraham

478746c4335911e894fa32d48460b955-780x521

A fascist hate mob launched a digital harassment and bullying campaign against a prominent self-defense activist, targeting her advertisers in an attempt to intimidate, threaten, and eliminate a powerful voice speaking out against their policies.

Fascists on Twitter organized a digital harassment campaign against prominent Second Amendment advocate Laura Ingraham, threatening her advertisers until some caved to the mob.

As of this writing, WayFair, Peak pet food, Expedia, & TripAdvisor had all publicly committed to withdrawing their advertisements from the Fox News host’s television show until further notice.

The pretext of the hate mob was a statement written by Ms. Ingraham admonishing a man for “whining” about being rejected from colleges. No Americans believed the pretext whatsoever and knew it was instead about Ms. Ingraham’s outspoken and loud advocacy for the Second Amendment and activism for constitutional freedoms.

George Soros funded groups and hacks were involved, as usual:

It is unknown at this point if there are any fascists on the boards of Wayfair, Expedia, TripAdvisor, or Peak. Many suspected that they simply wanted to launch a silencing campaign against the self-defense activist and used the pretext as plausible deniability.

The bullies took a victory lap on social media, taunting Ingraham over their power to intimidate corporations with threats and defamation campaigns:

The partnership between corporate behemoths and fascist activists illustrated a disturbing and growing trend in American society in 2018 of censorship, intimidation, and threats by the growing fascist Democrat Party.

The isolation and gang attack of Ms. Ingraham served two purposes: to silence and humiliate her personally, and to intimidate others watching. Fascist neo-Marxists have a long history of staging public humiliation campaigns in order to attempt to intimidate their enemies.

Ingraham made a tactical error by apologizing on Twitter, although it was most likely a compulsory move forced by her employer Fox News. An apology can be portrayed to the larger public as an admission of guilt and only serves to cement a narrative of Ingraham as the aggressor and her target as the victim.

In the wake of the Parkland murders, fascists lurking in the darkness have seized upon the tragedy to promulgate their talking points and hate speech from behind the faces of a select number of survivors, allowing them to attack any who protest as inhuman and lacking in sympathy.

Journalist and documentary filmmaker Michael Cernovich noted this well-documented tactic of Fascists using human shields for their propaganda:

The practice of fascists using human shields is a long and time honored tradition by them, whether it be Cindy Sheehan, to Gold Star parents attacking President Trump. It allows them to spew their hate speech through often times unwitting agents, and then neutralize incoming rebuttals by claiming victim status. Fascists generally do not subscribe to any moral standard, and thus see no problem in engaging in such tactics.

Conservatives, on the other hand, often do nothing other than complain and whine about such tactics instead of accepting that they are the rules of the game. Whilst fascists control the institutions of media, activism, and culture, they will always engage in immoral, unfair tactics against their enemies.

Fascist neo-Marxists see all struggles in terms of power and see their enemies as mere obstacles to be eliminated. Their perspective is fundamentally alien to the framework of rhetorical debate, a free exchange of ideas, mutual respect, and respect for humanity as outlined in the Founding documents and the Constitution.

Americans, libertarians, and conservatives must understand that the fascist cartel in America seeks only one thing and will commit any act, no matter how execrable, to accomplish it: the total control of power in the nation. Slander, libel, verbal assault, coordinated psychological assault, and in some cases physical violence are all merely tools in the fascists’ tool belt

They currently pose the greatest threat to liberty, peace, and freedom in the United States. It is for this reason that all dissenting factions must unite in the political defeat of the fascist class and forever shatter their control over the institutions of culture in the country: journalism, education, entertainment, activism, and technology.

The response to the mob assault on Laura Ingraham from conservative corners was disorganized and haphazard.

While journalist Mike Cernovich chided Ingraham for falling into such a predictable trap, others remained mostly silent or complained about the unfairness of it all.

They must instead immediately coalesce around the accurate narrative of a fascist mob silencing a woman and harassing her.

Many fascists in Ms. Ingraham’s Twitter comments verbally assaulted her in vile insults and with threats. Twitter support watched the cyber-bullying approvingly.

All Americans who stand against fascism must loudly condemn the digital assault of a freedom activist and stand together with her.

While Ms. Ingraham’s comment may have been in poor taste, the utilization of that as a pretext to intimidate and silence is far, far more disturbing.

#StandWithLaura

Racists Use Austin Tragedy To Foment Climate Of Hate And Prejudice

dy0nrk4u8aalw0e

Bigoted racists launched a false and defamatory campaign against white Americans and specifically men in the wake of the bombings, seizing upon the Austin tragedy and exploiting the race of the alleged perpetrator.

Regardless of the fact that zero evidence existed showing the Austin Bomber was motivated by race, gender, or religion, racists on social media exploited the anger in the aftermath to defame an entire demographic group based upon their prejudices.

The bomber, 24-year old Mark Conditt, has not left any clues so far as to his motivation. The only known online presence consists of a 6-year old Blogspot posting containing childish and simple arguments against gay marriage and against federal funding for abortion. Although he “identifies” as a conservative, he admits he barely knows what it means and does not really have any political ideas at the time. The blog postings appeared to be part of a school project, with the effort minimal and lacking in any real passion.

No other evidence appeared online as to the bomber’s state of mind.

Several images circulating on social media alleged that Conditt was a registered Democrat:

Conditt was raised in a Christian household and home-schooled for the entirety of his high school education, going on to Austin community college afterwards.

He worked for a precision manufacturing company, which may have been where he acquired some of his bomb-making expertise.

However, in the 6-year span since he completed his school project for community college, there is no paper or online trail of him at all. There is no evidence of a metamorphosis or conversion towards the ideological leftism which is endemic to the Austin community.

Racists on social media, however, launched a narrative defaming whites immediately:

The record shows there is zero evidence the bomber was an adherent of “white nationalism” or “Nazism”.

Although the bigots knew there was no evidence of a motive, they nevertheless propagated and perpetuated a false and misleading campaign smearing all white people, contributing to the already heightened tensions in the country.

Generally, terrorism is associated with violent actions which are driven by political motivations. Mentally unwell individuals who commit a string of violent acts are generally described as serial killers or something approximating that description.

The conflation with terrorism was part of a coordinated effort to paint an equivalency between radical Islamic terrorism, BLM targetings of law enforcement, and the Austin bombings. While Conditt did indeed blow up a bomb when law enforcement closed in on him, the term “suicide bomber” would not apply to prototypical radical Islamic attacks, where the primary goal is to murder large amounts of people in a suicide attack. It appears Conditt intended to evade law enforcement and only detonated the explosives as a last resort upon his impending capture.

While Conditt was indeed home-schooled, there is no evidence that he was “a devout Christian”.

The tabloid publication TMZ published a misleading article suggesting the bomber had recently been contemplating a mission trip, tarring the entire Christian faith in the process.

The record indicates the “mission trip” statement was derived from a comment Conditt’s mother made after his graduation in 2013. There is nothing to suggest Conditt ever completed or even contemplated a mission trip himself, as it could have been the wishful thinking of a devout mother for her son.

While many incidents of radical Islamic terrorism are quite clearly religiously motivated, with the attackers proclaiming “Allahu Akhbar”(God is greatest), with evidence of the perpetrators recently converting to Islam or attending mosques, there is no such equivalency in the Austin case.

Some racists used the tragedy to target online discussion boards like Reddit and 4chan:

While an anonymous user named “austinbomber” did indeed appear on Reddit claiming to be the perpetrator, police have not confirmed that as of this story publishing.

The notion that an online discussion forum is responsible for every single user to have ever posted there is not the thinking of serious people or experts. By the same standard, Twitter would be responsible for “radicalizing terrorists” for any random, unstable individual that created an account on their website.

The campaign to demonize white men was part of a larger strategy by the Democrat Party and its’ many coalitions to target their perceived political enemies. The voting base of Democrats has traditionally been African Americans, those of Hispanic descent, and white women. The Republicans’ voting base has traditionally been white men.

Noted Democrat activist Ed Krassenstein went to great pains to associate the race of the bomber with the act itself, stereotyping an entire ethnicity in the process.

The notion that race or gender played a motivating role in the bombings is a wholescale fabrication, as of the most recent news.

In the case of radical Islamic terrorism or BLM killings targeting law enforcement, there is usually a vast panoply of evidence pointing to a religious or racial motivation behind the criminal act.

it appeared that radical leftist factions are trying very hard to create an equivalency among their political enemies, the white male demographic. The problem is that it simply doesn’t exist. There is no single cohesive ideology to explain when murderous acts are perpetrated, save perhaps pharmaceutical or virulently leftist ones.

James Hodgkinson, a murderer who opened fire on Republicans, was an avid Rachel Maddow fan and supporter of Bernie Sanders.

Most school shooters have been on psychoactive pharmaceuticals of one variation or another.

The relatively isolated incidents of racially motivated incidents perpetrated by white individuals have generally emanated from the leftist Nazi movement, promoted by shadowy individuals such as Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, and Jason Kessler, who was previously affiliated with the radical left. It is no secret that the Spencer-led ethno-socialist movement is leftist in economic origins, advocating a socialist homeland and universal healthcare.

Nevertheless, the uncomfortable facts did not dissuade radical leftist ideologues from bombarding social media with racist attacks:

The unfortunate reality is that racists do not care about murder, or the deaths of innocents, or even how many lives they destroy.

Tragedies are merely incidents to be used and exploited. Carnage is a crisis to be seized and manipulated.

The truth does not matter to racists. Facts are selectively cherry-picked to fit their agenda. They don’t care about the victims of the Austin Bomber, just like they don’t care about the victims of radical Islamic terrorism or BLM terrorists, which they suppress in the media.

They only highlight an event which they strategically believe will support their political and bigoted narrative; one which they believe will help them gain power.

Some citizens of integrity noticed the pattern:

In a profound statement on the current state of journalism in America, author and columnist Ann Coulter simply highlighted two headlines:

The campaign of hatred has contributed to a volatile environment, with Twitter acting as an enabler. Racist hate speech that goes unchallenged can build to a crescendo of ignorance and bigotry against the targeted community.

It is imperative to push back as one community, with voices raised, when racists in the dark corners of the Internet conspire to spread their hate. It is the duty of civic-minded Americans to stand up, call it out, and condemn it loudly, so that it does not become normalized.

At the time of publishing, Twitter had not deleted any of the racist tweets, leading many to wonder if their deafening silence was a tacit endorsement.

Far-Left Political Organizations Exploit Parkland Child Victims In Massive Psy-Op To Disarm Citizenry

5a8e534087faf255018b477a-750-375

Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel listens as NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch speaks. Loesch, a rape survivor, was bullied, harassed, and verbally abused by the exclusively far-left crowd, while Israel, a Clinton supporter, was praised and wildly applauded for advocating the restriction of constitutional Second Amendment rights.

Sheriff Israel has come under fire for doing nothing about the shooter despite the police being called to his house 39 times, indirectly leading to the Parkland shooting. Remarkable, Israel has not only not apologized, he has had the gall to show his face in public and exploit the tragedy.

The American political left-wing machinery sprang into action after the Parkland school shooting, exploiting the child victims in a massive psychological operation designed to disarm the citizenry and restrict their Second Amendment rights.

Their propaganda arm CNN led the charge, working with far-left organizations to selectively pick child victims, rent busses, venues, and create signage to stage a massive psy-op designed to create the impression of national consensus.

Critics condemned the exploitation of child victims by the Democrat Party and their affiliated organizations, calling it “disgusting” and “sickening”. Many said they could never vote for the Democrats ever again after the spectacle of using child victims as human shields for their crass political purposes.

The act of exploiting the Parkland victims was compounded by the fact that the shooting was widely considered to be a creation of far-left Democrat policies, such as encouraging school violence through un-enforcement, the promotion of heavy psychotropic medication, and the degradation of culture through their Hollywood entertainment arm.

“The Democrats caused this shooting,” one insider remarked. “They need to sit down and shut up. They’re only making this worse.

The psy-op reached new heights on Wednesday night, as far-left CNN produced a propaganda spectacle straight out of Nazi Germany, with a hand-picked feral crowd and snotty, disrespectful activists comparing a Senator to a mass murderer, attacking the Second Amendment and its’ pre-eminent civil rights organization, all under the false pretense of representing child victims.

This scene was straight out of the Soviet Union:

The utilization of this particular insufferable individual, who is doing his best to destroy any remaining sympathy for the Parkland victims, highlights a trend that appears to be intentional among the political Left: the notion that attempting to publicly humiliate or embarrass your opponent is a substitute for actual discussion or dialogue.

The fact that this teenager is so extremely comfortable employing this particular technique tells us not only that this has become the Left’s primary technique for debate, but that it has become a taught methodology by leftist parents.

It is the tactic borne from the mindset of a totalitarian, who does not wish to compromise or exchange ideas, but instead wishes to psychologically shame their opponent into submission through carefully constructed stagecraft. The control of the building, filling it with far-left supporters, the creation of the embarrassment dynamic – it was all planned from the beginning by CNN. All they needed to do was find someone pompous, self-entitled, and full of himself to actually do it. This child does not even remotely represent the Parkland victims. He is an anomaly.

CNN carefully controlled the staged event, screening out any Parkland victims who did advocate restricting the Second Amendment, and instead populating the auditorium with far-left Democrats, their children, and their supporters.

Parkland shooting survivors who wished to ask questions about school security were banned by CNN from participating unless they engaged in the sham “town hall”, with one student testifying that he was ordered to read from a script or not participate.

The effect was a bizarre and disturbing jeering, bullying, and harassing environment, particularly when a rape survivor and spokeswoman for the civil rights organization NRA participated in the discussion. She was verbally abused from the crowd while passionately advocating for rape victims and survivors.

While there were thousands of students that survived the Parkland shooting, the major media corporations working in co-ordination with CNN selectively picked a handful to represent the entire student body. Those students were all primarily children of far-left parents and all advocate the restriction and elimination of the Second Amendment. Some have advocated violence against Republicans, NRA members, and others.

Critics said this small number of selective survivors does not represent the larger student body, or even the younger generation at large. Many younger students support school fortification, greater defenses, and the strengthening of a select number of qualified teachers.

The shadowy far-left organizations behind the bussing, organizing, signage, and booking of certain specific students stayed in the background. Yet within days of the shooting, a domain had been registered and an entire expensive website constructed for a propaganda operation staged for March 24. Many wondered which central organization was coordinating the PR spectacle, what office they were working out of, and where their funding was derived from. These questions are still unanswered.

The spectacle was a potent reminder of the power of the far-left-media complex, a synergistic co-operation among the major media corporations and political organizations that can convince many naive Americans of a false reality of the situation, and a reminder of the necessity of dismantling the structures that support and propagate far-left supremacy in society.

Twitter-Allied Platform MEDIUM Silences Free Speech Rights Of Independent Journalists

alltwitter-twitter-bird-logo-white-on-blue

Twitter-allied platform MEDIUM silenced the free speech rights of independent journalists Michael Cernovich, Laura Loomer, and Jack Posobiec, as they immediately vowed to sue in court.

The popular writing platform run by Twitter co-founder Evan Williams arbitrarily destroyed all of the journalists’ articles, editorials, and thinkpieces.

MEDIUM attempted to defend their actions by claiming the journalists were members of the Alt-Right, a discredited and highly controversial group that espouses socialist and racial rhetoric.

In reality, none of the censored journalists are members of the Alt-Right. While Cernovich did identify with the movement in its’ infancy, when it was primarily an immigration advocacy group, he publicly broke with the group and denounced them when they first appropriated National Socialist imagery, symbolism, and language, at a small conference in Washington, DC, organized by its’ self-professed founder Richard Spencer.

The journalist and lawyer immediately condemned the group and said he no longer identified with the movement in a public statement at the time.

Cernovich has in fact been the target of a long and steady campaign of harassment by Alt-Right members, who have attacked his Persian wife and baby with vile racial language.

The decision by MEDIUM to censor the independent reporters based upon false information has raised questions about the company’s true motivations. Critics said the true motivation was retaliation for exposing the censorship scandal at the Big Four social media corporations. The action is doubly curious due to a similar action by Twitter around the exact same time to conduct a “bot purge”, which has reportedly disproportionately affected right-of-center figures.

The two operations, conducted at roughly the same time, have caused critics to wonder if Twitter is effectively implementing a political purge of its’ ideological enemies.

In a misleading article written for Outline on the MEDIUM platform, apparent ally Paris Martineau continued to propagate the false narrative of affiliation with the Alt-Right as the claim for the censorship.

Neither Jack Posobiec or Laura Loomer currently identify as Alt-Right members, and it is unknown if they ever have.

Unlike billion-dollar Silicon Valley mega-corporations, Cernovich, Posobiec, & Loomer are all private individuals unaffiliated with large companies or powerful journalistic enterprises. Many of them rely on donations from citizens who support their work. Cernovich is currently working on a documentary on accuracy in media reportage.

The reaction to the powerful corporations silencing the First Amendment rights of the powerless was swift and furious on Twitter.

Free press advocate and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange condemned the censorship:

Independent journalist, lawyer, and author Michael Cernovich announced that he was immediately suing Medium.

The major social media corporations have all seen their public image suffer recently due to censorship scandals. Google, Youtube, Facebook & Twitter have all had to absorb negative press as a result of their hamhanded, sometimes Orwellian thought control.

The education and documentary company PragerU recently filed a lawsuit against YouTube for censoring their educational videos. Many media critics have begun to openly speculate if there is an ideological agenda at the Big Four.

The stifling of free speech across America has raised an important question about corporate rights and responsibility. While companies have historically had a large leeway to control the discourse within their control, the monopolistic and all-encompassing nature of the Big Four’s control on public discourse means that in practice they effectively function as a government arm, with the power to determine what is and is not appropriate speech.

Those who are silenced are effectively rendered invisible. A new speech policy by Youtube or Twitter essentially functions as a new law passed by the US legislature. Few anticipated that corporations would abuse their power to amplify their allies’ voices and squelch their enemies. But that is what is occurring in America in 2018.

As the progressive political movement has captured and consolidated their control over the Big Four, their accompanying censorship has raised difficult questions for the American people and legislators at large.

When four corporations control such an enormous part of speech in America and subsequently abuses that responsibility to oppress their enemies, must the government step in to protect the oppressed? When the Big Four collude and act as one to violate citizens’ First Amendment rights, does the American government and its’ regulatory arms have a responsibility to intervene?

If they do not either break up the Big Four or levy enormous legal fines for suppressing freedom of speech, the First Amendment will essentially cease to exist in reality. Free speech advocates say that although it might remain in principle, as words written on an ancient piece of paper, the new reality in 2018 America will be a society ruled by the new Social Stasi.

This tension has already resulted in flashpoints, from former Google engineer and manifesto author James Damore’s lawsuit against the search behemoth, to Cernovich’s new lawsuit against Medium. The two cases spell enormous import for the future of speech, discussion, and who can dictate it in the nation.

Billionaire George Soros Staged Fake Riots In Ferguson

MW-EE076_soros__20160127113703_ZH

The Daily Mail has reported that billionaire agitator and currency pillager George Soros spent 33 million dollars to stage fake riots that caused significant damage to property and potential loss of life.

In addition, Soros’ provocateurs descended upon the state from their headquarters in New York City and Washington, DC, to stage false media events, which they then reported on through their media arms.

The entire operation was amplified by the American corporate news media and presented as authentic and genuine.

The partnership between the major American media corporations and the Soros agitation organizations has been a potent one. The most recent example of their synergistic efficiency has been the mobilization of exploited children in public schools across the nation, as irresponsible parents and hardline teachers have abused their young, impressionable children for ideological gain.

Nevertheless, the mere fact that public school students have mobilized in any form has proven the ability of the major media corporations to amplify Soros Operations and project them as major cultural moments.

The Soros operation is vast and encompasses hundreds of organizations that present themselves as separate entities, but in reality work on parallel tracks to promote the same language, political figures, and events.

These organizations divide into three major subgroups, with several basic examples listed:

  • Think Tank Organizations:
    • Center For American Progress – One of the largest Soros-funded organizations, they produce propaganda and legislation for their larger goal.
  • Propaganda organizations:
    • Media Matters – One of the largest and most effective information warfare operations, MM employs tens, if not hundreds of employees, has a multi-million dollar budget, and focuses primarily on policing, censoring, and smearing those who oppose their agenda.
  • Mobilization organizations:
    • MoveOn.Org – Tasked with forming rallies and mobilizing the unstable individuals imbibing CAP & MM propaganda, the executive Director of MoveOn boasted of the violence that occurred in Chicago when it successfully played a role in destabilizing the situation and forcing then-presidential candidate Donald Trump to postpone his rally.

Questions are being raised as to the legality of the specific Ferguson operation, and whether Soros employees crossed state lines with the intention of inciting a riot. That is a crime, and one which can carry a penalty of years in prison.

Ferguson-Unrest-Police-Car-on-Fire

The fake Ferguson riots impacted the national psyche at a delicate moment in the country’s consciousness, and one in which President Obama inflamed racial tensions across the nation. From the Trayvon Martin incident, which was judged by a jury to be a justified execution, to the Michael Brown action, also deemed to be justified, former President Obama seized every opportunity to incite racial hatred against white Americans and divide the races.

The revelation that Soros essentially worked in parallel with Obama to further amplify racial anger and fearmonger arrived as a shock to Americans. Many are calling for the Hungarian-born billionaire to be held accountable for his harmful, damaging actions to the country.

It is illegal to cross state lines with the intention of starting a riot. During the Ferguson riots, many homes and businesses were burned down to the ground. It now appears as if those fires may have been started by Soros employees with the goal of dividing the races against each other and starting a race war.

The Trump administration has not commented so far on what legal action, if any, they will take against Soros for these new revelations.